Country · October 2026
RussiaRussia's top sites: post-quantum TLS, October 2026
The 990 most visited sites in Russia — the top-1,000 popularity bucket of the Chrome UX Report for September 2026 — scanned on with the same scanner as the rest of the issue. 955 of them completed a handshake.
- 27%
- negotiate X25519MLKEM768
- 29.8%
- sign with ECDSA
- 79.3%
- negotiate TLS 1.3
- 40.4%
- still accept TLS 1.0 or 1.1
- 0.1%
- meet the 2029 lifetime rule
- 52.5%
- graded A or A+
9 of 9 countries; the world list: 58.7%
the world list: 41%
the world list: 84.8%
the world list: 29.5%
median lifetime: 90 days
the world list: 61.6%
Compared with the other countries
The same figures for every country list of the issue and for the world list.
| List | Measured | X25519MLKEM768 | ECDSA | TLS 1.3 | TLS 1.0/1.1 | A or A+ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tranco top 10,000 | 7,909 | 58.7% | 41% | 84.8% | 29.5% | 61.6% |
| Mexico | 942 | 77% | 50.3% | 92.5% | 32.9% | 60.8% |
| Brazil | 971 | 73.6% | 52.9% | 90.4% | 38.6% | 56.5% |
| France | 988 | 73.1% | 48.7% | 93.8% | 23.5% | 72.2% |
| Germany | 999 | 72.8% | 51.8% | 94.8% | 24.8% | 72.3% |
| Spain | 991 | 68.4% | 40.1% | 87% | 23.6% | 66.1% |
| Taiwan | 947 | 66.8% | 46.7% | 85.9% | 43.7% | 45.2% |
| China | 963 | 63.2% | 55.1% | 87.9% | 61.5% | 33.3% |
| Japan | 969 | 58% | 27.9% | 78.1% | 31.9% | 56.3% |
| Russia | 955 | 27% | 29.8% | 79.3% | 40.4% | 52.5% |
The details
Leaf certificate key algorithms
Share of the 955 domains that completed a handshake.
Show the numbers as a table
| Key family | Domains | Share |
|---|---|---|
| RSA | 670 | 70.2% |
| ECDSA | 285 | 29.8% |
Exact key types
Curve for elliptic-curve keys, modulus size for RSA.
Show the numbers as a table
| Key type | Domains | Share |
|---|---|---|
| RSA-2048 | 558 | 58.4% |
| ECDSA P-256 | 278 | 29.1% |
| RSA-4096 | 109 | 11.4% |
| ECDSA P-384 | 7 | 0.7% |
| RSA-3072 | 3 | 0.3% |
Issuing CAs, and what they issue
Issuing intermediates folded into the operator behind them. The bar is the CA's share; the table shows how the same certificates split between ECDSA and RSA.
Show the numbers as a table
| Certificate authority | Domains | Share |
|---|---|---|
| Let's Encrypt | 497 | 52% |
| GlobalSign | 261 | 27.3% |
| Google Trust Services | 99 | 10.4% |
| Other / smaller CAs | 56 | 5.9% |
| DigiCert | 16 | 1.7% |
| Sectigo | 15 | 1.6% |
| Amazon | 7 | 0.7% |
| GoDaddy | 2 | 0.2% |
| Smaller CAs (2) | 2 | 0.2% |
Protocol negotiated by a modern client
What our scanner and the server agreed on when both were free to pick the best available version.
Show the numbers as a table
| TLS version | Domains | Share |
|---|---|---|
| TLS 1.3 | 757 | 79.3% |
| TLS 1.2 | 198 | 20.7% |
Response to a deliberately obsolete handshake
A separate connection per domain, offering nothing above TLS 1.1 (and, where that succeeds, a second one capped at TLS 1.0).
Show the numbers as a table
| Behaviour | Domains | Share |
|---|---|---|
| Refused TLS 1.0 and 1.1 | 569 | 59.6% |
| Accepted TLS 1.0 and TLS 1.1 | 361 | 37.8% |
| Accepted TLS 1.1 | 25 | 2.6% |
Certificate lifetime distribution
Total notBefore → notAfter validity of the leaf certificate, for the 955 domains measured. The highlighted bucket is the one that already satisfies the 2029 limit.
Show the numbers as a table
| Lifetime | Domains | Share |
|---|---|---|
| ≤ 47 days | 1 | 0.1% |
| 48–100 days | 609 | 63.8% |
| 101–200 days | 211 | 22.1% |
| 201–398 days | 134 | 14% |
| > 398 days | 0 | 0% |
90 days
median lifetime; the mean is 156 days, the shortest 45 and the longest 397
63.9%
would already satisfy the 100-day cap that starts in March 2027
0.1%
would already satisfy the 47-day cap that starts in March 2029 — 1 certificate in total
Grade distribution
All 955 domains that completed a handshake.
Show the numbers as a table
| Grade | Domains | Share |
|---|---|---|
| A+ | 125 | 13.1% |
| A | 376 | 39.4% |
| B | 89 | 9.3% |
| C | 351 | 36.8% |
| D | 12 | 1.3% |
| F | 2 | 0.2% |
Most frequent findings
Every observation the grader made, ranked by how many domains it applied to. Green is praise, amber is a deduction, red is disqualifying.
Show the numbers as a table
| Finding | Domains | Share |
|---|---|---|
| Classical algorithm — migration ahead | 955 | 100% |
| Chain complete as served | 952 | 99.7% |
| Within validity period | 871 | 91.2% |
| TLS 1.3 negotiated | 757 | 79.3% |
| Lifetime of 90 days or less | 604 | 63.2% |
| Legacy TLS refused | 569 | 59.6% |
| RSA-2048 — fine, but not compact | 558 | 58.4% |
| TLS 1.0 accepted | 361 | 37.8% |
| Modern key (ECDSA / EdDSA) | 285 | 29.8% |
| TLS 1.3 not offered | 198 | 20.7% |
| RSA above 2048 bits | 112 | 11.7% |
| In the renewal window (< 30 days) | 60 | 6.3% |
Why domains dropped out
Share of the 35 domains that produced no result. One attempt each — the scanner never retries.
Show the numbers as a table
| Reason | Domains | Share |
|---|---|---|
| No handshake before the timeout | 30 | 85.7% |
| No public DNS answer | 3 | 8.6% |
| Port 443 refused or reset | 2 | 5.7% |
Data
The hosts behind these numbers are rows of the issue's per-host CSV whose crux_countries column contains ru. Country lists come from the Chrome UX Report by Google (CC BY 4.0); the results are licensed under CC BY 4.0.
Where does your domain sit?
Every number on this page came out of a scan you can run yourself, one domain at a time, for free.