Country · October 2026
BrazilBrazil's top sites: post-quantum TLS, October 2026
The 999 most visited sites in Brazil — the top-1,000 popularity bucket of the Chrome UX Report for September 2026 — scanned on with the same scanner as the rest of the issue. 971 of them completed a handshake.
- 73.6%
- negotiate X25519MLKEM768
- 52.9%
- sign with ECDSA
- 90.4%
- negotiate TLS 1.3
- 38.6%
- still accept TLS 1.0 or 1.1
- 0.5%
- meet the 2029 lifetime rule
- 56.5%
- graded A or A+
2 of 9 countries; the world list: 58.7%
the world list: 41%
the world list: 84.8%
the world list: 29.5%
median lifetime: 90 days
the world list: 61.6%
Compared with the other countries
The same figures for every country list of the issue and for the world list.
| List | Measured | X25519MLKEM768 | ECDSA | TLS 1.3 | TLS 1.0/1.1 | A or A+ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tranco top 10,000 | 7,909 | 58.7% | 41% | 84.8% | 29.5% | 61.6% |
| Mexico | 942 | 77% | 50.3% | 92.5% | 32.9% | 60.8% |
| Brazil | 971 | 73.6% | 52.9% | 90.4% | 38.6% | 56.5% |
| France | 988 | 73.1% | 48.7% | 93.8% | 23.5% | 72.2% |
| Germany | 999 | 72.8% | 51.8% | 94.8% | 24.8% | 72.3% |
| Spain | 991 | 68.4% | 40.1% | 87% | 23.6% | 66.1% |
| Taiwan | 947 | 66.8% | 46.7% | 85.9% | 43.7% | 45.2% |
| China | 963 | 63.2% | 55.1% | 87.9% | 61.5% | 33.3% |
| Japan | 969 | 58% | 27.9% | 78.1% | 31.9% | 56.3% |
| Russia | 955 | 27% | 29.8% | 79.3% | 40.4% | 52.5% |
The details
Leaf certificate key algorithms
Share of the 971 domains that completed a handshake.
Show the numbers as a table
| Key family | Domains | Share |
|---|---|---|
| ECDSA | 514 | 52.9% |
| RSA | 457 | 47.1% |
Exact key types
Curve for elliptic-curve keys, modulus size for RSA.
Show the numbers as a table
| Key type | Domains | Share |
|---|---|---|
| ECDSA P-256 | 512 | 52.7% |
| RSA-2048 | 421 | 43.4% |
| RSA-4096 | 34 | 3.5% |
| ECDSA P-384 | 2 | 0.2% |
| RSA-3072 | 2 | 0.2% |
Issuing CAs, and what they issue
Issuing intermediates folded into the operator behind them. The bar is the CA's share; the table shows how the same certificates split between ECDSA and RSA.
Show the numbers as a table
| Certificate authority | Domains | Share |
|---|---|---|
| Google Trust Services | 361 | 37.2% |
| Let's Encrypt | 211 | 21.7% |
| DigiCert | 138 | 14.2% |
| Amazon | 93 | 9.6% |
| Sectigo | 55 | 5.7% |
| Other / smaller CAs | 51 | 5.3% |
| GlobalSign | 37 | 3.8% |
| Microsoft | 10 | 1% |
| Smaller CAs (3) | 15 | 1.5% |
Protocol negotiated by a modern client
What our scanner and the server agreed on when both were free to pick the best available version.
Show the numbers as a table
| TLS version | Domains | Share |
|---|---|---|
| TLS 1.3 | 878 | 90.4% |
| TLS 1.2 | 93 | 9.6% |
Response to a deliberately obsolete handshake
A separate connection per domain, offering nothing above TLS 1.1 (and, where that succeeds, a second one capped at TLS 1.0).
Show the numbers as a table
| Behaviour | Domains | Share |
|---|---|---|
| Refused TLS 1.0 and 1.1 | 596 | 61.4% |
| Accepted TLS 1.0 and TLS 1.1 | 345 | 35.5% |
| Accepted TLS 1.1 | 29 | 3% |
| Accepted TLS 1.0 | 1 | 0.1% |
Certificate lifetime distribution
Total notBefore → notAfter validity of the leaf certificate, for the 971 domains measured. The highlighted bucket is the one that already satisfies the 2029 limit.
Show the numbers as a table
| Lifetime | Domains | Share |
|---|---|---|
| ≤ 47 days | 5 | 0.5% |
| 48–100 days | 599 | 61.7% |
| 101–200 days | 264 | 27.2% |
| 201–398 days | 103 | 10.6% |
| > 398 days | 0 | 0% |
90 days
median lifetime; the mean is 149.4 days, the shortest 14 and the longest 397
62.2%
would already satisfy the 100-day cap that starts in March 2027
0.5%
would already satisfy the 47-day cap that starts in March 2029 — 5 certificates in total
Grade distribution
All 971 domains that completed a handshake.
Show the numbers as a table
| Grade | Domains | Share |
|---|---|---|
| A+ | 173 | 17.8% |
| A | 376 | 38.7% |
| B | 67 | 6.9% |
| C | 345 | 35.5% |
| D | 8 | 0.8% |
| F | 2 | 0.2% |
Most frequent findings
Every observation the grader made, ranked by how many domains it applied to. Green is praise, amber is a deduction, red is disqualifying.
Show the numbers as a table
| Finding | Domains | Share |
|---|---|---|
| Classical algorithm — migration ahead | 971 | 100% |
| Chain complete as served | 966 | 99.5% |
| Within validity period | 915 | 94.2% |
| TLS 1.3 negotiated | 878 | 90.4% |
| Legacy TLS refused | 596 | 61.4% |
| Lifetime of 90 days or less | 589 | 60.7% |
| Modern key (ECDSA / EdDSA) | 514 | 52.9% |
| RSA-2048 — fine, but not compact | 421 | 43.4% |
| TLS 1.0 accepted | 346 | 35.6% |
| TLS 1.3 not offered | 93 | 9.6% |
| In the renewal window (< 30 days) | 37 | 3.8% |
| RSA above 2048 bits | 36 | 3.7% |
Why domains dropped out
Share of the 28 domains that produced no result. One attempt each — the scanner never retries.
Show the numbers as a table
| Reason | Domains | Share |
|---|---|---|
| No handshake before the timeout | 19 | 67.9% |
| No public DNS answer | 5 | 17.9% |
| Resolves to reserved address space | 2 | 7.1% |
| Handshake or certificate error | 1 | 3.6% |
| Port 443 refused or reset | 1 | 3.6% |
Data
The hosts behind these numbers are rows of the issue's per-host CSV whose crux_countries column contains br. Country lists come from the Chrome UX Report by Google (CC BY 4.0); the results are licensed under CC BY 4.0.
Where does your domain sit?
Every number on this page came out of a scan you can run yourself, one domain at a time, for free.