Skip to content
ecdsa.com

Country · October 2026

JapanJapan's top sites: post-quantum TLS, October 2026

The 993 most visited sites in Japan — the top-1,000 popularity bucket of the Chrome UX Report for September 2026 — scanned on with the same scanner as the rest of the issue. 969 of them completed a handshake.

58%
negotiate X25519MLKEM768

8 of 9 countries; the world list: 58.7%

27.9%
sign with ECDSA

the world list: 41%

78.1%
negotiate TLS 1.3

the world list: 84.8%

31.9%
still accept TLS 1.0 or 1.1

the world list: 29.5%

0.1%
meet the 2029 lifetime rule

median lifetime: 198 days

56.3%
graded A or A+

the world list: 61.6%

Compared with the other countries

The same figures for every country list of the issue and for the world list.

Key figures by list and country
ListMeasuredX25519MLKEM768ECDSATLS 1.3TLS 1.0/1.1A or A+
Tranco top 10,0007,90958.7%41%84.8%29.5%61.6%
Mexico94277%50.3%92.5%32.9%60.8%
Brazil97173.6%52.9%90.4%38.6%56.5%
France98873.1%48.7%93.8%23.5%72.2%
Germany99972.8%51.8%94.8%24.8%72.3%
Spain99168.4%40.1%87%23.6%66.1%
Taiwan94766.8%46.7%85.9%43.7%45.2%
China96363.2%55.1%87.9%61.5%33.3%
Japan96958%27.9%78.1%31.9%56.3%
Russia95527%29.8%79.3%40.4%52.5%

The details

Leaf certificate key algorithms

Share of the 969 domains that completed a handshake.

RSA72.1%699ECDSA27.9%270
Show the numbers as a table
Leaf certificate key algorithms
Key familyDomainsShare
RSA69972.1%
ECDSA27027.9%

Exact key types

Curve for elliptic-curve keys, modulus size for RSA.

RSA-204870.5%683ECDSA P-25627.7%268RSA-40961.4%14ECDSA P-3840.2%2RSA-30720.2%2
Show the numbers as a table
Exact key types on leaf certificates
Key typeDomainsShare
RSA-204868370.5%
ECDSA P-25626827.7%
RSA-4096141.4%
ECDSA P-38420.2%
RSA-307220.2%

Issuing CAs, and what they issue

Issuing intermediates folded into the operator behind them. The bar is the CA's share; the table shows how the same certificates split between ECDSA and RSA.

Amazon25.5%247DigiCert23.2%225Other / smaller CAs14.3%139Google Trust Services13.6%132Let's Encrypt11.9%115GlobalSign8.8%85Sectigo2.2%21Microsoft0.2%2Smaller CAs (3)0.3%3
Show the numbers as a table
Certificate authorities by share of the sample
Certificate authorityDomainsShare
Amazon24725.5%
DigiCert22523.2%
Other / smaller CAs13914.3%
Google Trust Services13213.6%
Let's Encrypt11511.9%
GlobalSign858.8%
Sectigo212.2%
Microsoft20.2%
Smaller CAs (3)30.3%

Protocol negotiated by a modern client

What our scanner and the server agreed on when both were free to pick the best available version.

TLS 1.378.1%757TLS 1.221.9%212
Show the numbers as a table
Negotiated TLS version
TLS versionDomainsShare
TLS 1.375778.1%
TLS 1.221221.9%

Response to a deliberately obsolete handshake

A separate connection per domain, offering nothing above TLS 1.1 (and, where that succeeds, a second one capped at TLS 1.0).

Refused TLS 1.0 and 1.168.1%660Accepted TLS 1.0 and TLS 1.129.7%288Accepted TLS 1.12.2%21
Show the numbers as a table
Server response to a handshake capped at TLS 1.1 or lower
BehaviourDomainsShare
Refused TLS 1.0 and 1.166068.1%
Accepted TLS 1.0 and TLS 1.128829.7%
Accepted TLS 1.1212.2%

Certificate lifetime distribution

Total notBefore → notAfter validity of the leaf certificate, for the 969 domains measured. The highlighted bucket is the one that already satisfies the 2029 limit.

0.1%≤ 47 days126.4%48–100 days25648.6%101–200 days47124.9%201–398 days2410%> 398 days0
Show the numbers as a table
Certificate lifetime distribution in days
LifetimeDomainsShare
≤ 47 days10.1%
48–100 days25626.4%
101–200 days47148.6%
201–398 days24124.9%
> 398 days00%

198 days

median lifetime; the mean is 216.2 days, the shortest 30 and the longest 397

26.5%

would already satisfy the 100-day cap that starts in March 2027

0.1%

would already satisfy the 47-day cap that starts in March 2029 — 1 certificate in total

Grade distribution

All 969 domains that completed a handshake.

5.4%52A51%494B13.8%134C29.4%285
Show the numbers as a table
Distribution of A+ to F grades
GradeDomainsShare
A+525.4%
A49451%
B13413.8%
C28529.4%
D30.3%
F10.1%

Most frequent findings

Every observation the grader made, ranked by how many domains it applied to. Green is praise, amber is a deduction, red is disqualifying.

Chain complete as served100%969Classical algorithm — migration ahead100%969Within validity period95.7%927TLS 1.3 negotiated78.1%757RSA-2048 — fine, but not compact70.5%683Legacy TLS refused68.1%660TLS 1.0 accepted29.7%288Modern key (ECDSA / EdDSA)27.9%270Lifetime of 90 days or less26%252TLS 1.3 not offered21.9%212In the renewal window (< 30 days)3%29TLS 1.1 accepted2.2%21
Show the numbers as a table
Most frequent grader findings
FindingDomainsShare
Chain complete as served969100%
Classical algorithm — migration ahead969100%
Within validity period92795.7%
TLS 1.3 negotiated75778.1%
RSA-2048 — fine, but not compact68370.5%
Legacy TLS refused66068.1%
TLS 1.0 accepted28829.7%
Modern key (ECDSA / EdDSA)27027.9%
Lifetime of 90 days or less25226%
TLS 1.3 not offered21221.9%
In the renewal window (< 30 days)293%
TLS 1.1 accepted212.2%

Why domains dropped out

Share of the 24 domains that produced no result. One attempt each — the scanner never retries.

Handshake or certificate error45.8%11No handshake before the timeout29.2%7No public DNS answer20.8%5Port 443 refused or reset4.2%1
Show the numbers as a table
Reasons domains produced no measurement
ReasonDomainsShare
Handshake or certificate error1145.8%
No handshake before the timeout729.2%
No public DNS answer520.8%
Port 443 refused or reset14.2%

Data

The hosts behind these numbers are rows of the issue's per-host CSV whose crux_countries column contains jp. Country lists come from the Chrome UX Report by Google (CC BY 4.0); the results are licensed under CC BY 4.0.

The October 2026 issue

Where does your domain sit?

Every number on this page came out of a scan you can run yourself, one domain at a time, for free.