Post-Quantum Algorithm Zoo — zoo des algorithmes post-quantiques : tailles et vitesse de plus de 100 algorithmes
Les 103 algorithmes fournis par liboqs, des normes du NIST aux candidats du tour des signatures supplémentaires : filtrez, triez par taille et choisissez-en un à mesurer. Le banc d’essai compile liboqs en WebAssembly, s’exécute dans un worker en arrière-plan sur votre propre appareil et compare le résultat à ECDSA P-256, Ed25519 ou X25519, mesurés de la même manière.
100 % local : le code des algorithmes n’est téléchargé depuis ce site qu’au moment de la mesure, et il s’exécute dans votre navigateur ; rien sur votre appareil ni sur les résultats n’est envoyé nulle part
103 algorithmes de liboqs 0.15.1 : 38 mécanismes d’encapsulation de clé et 65 schémas de signature, répartis en 15 familles.
ML-KEM-768
Tailles par rapport aux algorithmes classiques
| Algorithme | Clé publique |
|---|---|
| ML-KEM-768 | 1 184 o |
| X25519 | 32 o |
| Algorithme | Signature / texte chiffré |
|---|---|
| ML-KEM-768 | 1 088 o |
| X25519 | 32 o |
Clé publique plus texte chiffré : 35,5 fois l’équivalent X25519. Les tailles classiques correspondent aux encodages bruts : points EC non compressés, r‖s pour ECDSA, clé PKCS #1 pour RSA-2048.
- Normalisé dans FIPS 203 (août 2024). Le KEM à déployer : TLS, SSH et HPKE définissent déjà comment l’utiliser.
Mesurer sur cet appareil
Exécute la génération de clés et l’encapsulation et la décapsulation dans un worker en arrière-plan, pendant au plus 3 secondes environ par opération, ainsi que les mêmes opérations avec X25519 pour comparaison. Chaque résultat est vérifié : un build défectueux ne peut donc pas annoncer une valeur rapide mais fausse.
103 algorithmes sur 103
| Algorithme | Famille | Statut | Niveau | Clé publique | Clé privée | Signature / texte chiffré | Clé + sortie (échelle logarithmique) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SLH-DSA | Norme NIST | 1 | 32 o | 64 o | 17 088 o | ||
| SLH-DSA | Norme NIST | 1 | 32 o | 64 o | 7 856 o | ||
| SLH-DSA | Norme NIST | 1 | 32 o | 64 o | 17 088 o | ||
| SLH-DSA | Norme NIST | 1 | 32 o | 64 o | 7 856 o | ||
| SLH-DSA | Norme NIST | 3 | 48 o | 96 o | 35 664 o | ||
| SLH-DSA | Norme NIST | 3 | 48 o | 96 o | 16 224 o | ||
| SLH-DSA | Norme NIST | 3 | 48 o | 96 o | 35 664 o | ||
| SLH-DSA | Norme NIST | 3 | 48 o | 96 o | 16 224 o | ||
| CROSS | Candidat du NIST | 1 | 54 o | 32 o | 9 120 o | ||
| CROSS | Candidat du NIST | 1 | 54 o | 32 o | 11 980 o | ||
| CROSS | Candidat du NIST | 1 | 54 o | 32 o | 8 960 o | ||
| SLH-DSA | Norme NIST | 5 | 64 o | 128 o | 49 856 o | ||
| SLH-DSA | Norme NIST | 5 | 64 o | 128 o | 29 792 o | ||
| SLH-DSA | Norme NIST | 5 | 64 o | 128 o | 49 856 o | ||
| SLH-DSA | Norme NIST | 5 | 64 o | 128 o | 29 792 o | ||
| CROSS | Candidat du NIST | 1 | 77 o | 32 o | 13 152 o | ||
| CROSS | Candidat du NIST | 1 | 77 o | 32 o | 18 432 o | ||
| CROSS | Candidat du NIST | 1 | 77 o | 32 o | 12 432 o | ||
| CROSS | Candidat du NIST | 3 | 83 o | 48 o | 22 464 o | ||
| CROSS | Candidat du NIST | 3 | 83 o | 48 o | 26 772 o | ||
| CROSS | Candidat du NIST | 3 | 83 o | 48 o | 20 452 o | ||
| CROSS | Candidat du NIST | 5 | 106 o | 64 o | 40 100 o | ||
| CROSS | Candidat du NIST | 5 | 106 o | 64 o | 48 102 o | ||
| CROSS | Candidat du NIST | 5 | 106 o | 64 o | 36 454 o | ||
| CROSS | Candidat du NIST | 3 | 115 o | 48 o | 29 853 o | ||
| CROSS | Candidat du NIST | 3 | 115 o | 48 o | 41 406 o | ||
| CROSS | Candidat du NIST | 3 | 115 o | 48 o | 28 391 o | ||
| CROSS | Candidat du NIST | 5 | 153 o | 64 o | 53 527 o | ||
| CROSS | Candidat du NIST | 5 | 153 o | 64 o | 74 590 o | ||
| CROSS | Candidat du NIST | 5 | 153 o | 64 o | 50 818 o | ||
| NTRU | Non retenu par le NIST | 1 | 699 o | 935 o | 699 o | ||
| CRYSTALS-Kyber | Remplacé | 1 | 800 o | 1 632 o | 768 o | ||
| ML-KEM | Norme NIST | 1 | 800 o | 1 632 o | 768 o | ||
| Falcon | Sélectionné par le NIST, norme en préparation | 1 | 897 o | 1 281 o | ≤ 752 o | ||
| Falcon | Sélectionné par le NIST, norme en préparation | 1 | 897 o | 1 281 o | 666 o | ||
| NTRU | Non retenu par le NIST | 3 | 930 o | 1 234 o | 930 o | ||
| SNOVA | Candidat du NIST | 1 | 1 016 o | 48 o | 248 o | ||
| SNOVA | Candidat du NIST | 1 | 1 016 o | 48 o | 248 o | ||
| SNOVA | Candidat du NIST | 1 | 1 016 o | 36 848 o | 248 o | ||
| SNOVA | Candidat du NIST | 1 | 1 016 o | 36 848 o | 248 o | ||
| NTRU | Non retenu par le NIST | 3 | 1 138 o | 1 450 o | 1 138 o | ||
| Streamlined NTRU Prime | Non retenu par le NIST | 3 | 1 158 o | 1 763 o | 1 039 o | ||
| CRYSTALS-Kyber | Remplacé | 3 | 1 184 o | 2 400 o | 1 088 o | ||
| ML-KEM | Norme NIST | 3 | 1 184 o | 2 400 o | 1 088 o | ||
| NTRU | Non retenu par le NIST | 5 | 1 230 o | 1 590 o | 1 230 o | ||
| ML-DSA | Norme NIST | 2 | 1 312 o | 2 560 o | 2 420 o | ||
| MAYO | Candidat du NIST | 1 | 1 420 o | 24 o | 454 o | ||
| CRYSTALS-Kyber | Remplacé | 5 | 1 568 o | 3 168 o | 1 568 o | ||
| ML-KEM | Norme NIST | 5 | 1 568 o | 3 168 o | 1 568 o | ||
| SNOVA | Candidat du NIST | 1 | 1 579 o | 48 o | 379 o | ||
| Falcon | Sélectionné par le NIST, norme en préparation | 5 | 1 793 o | 2 305 o | ≤ 1 462 o | ||
| Falcon | Sélectionné par le NIST, norme en préparation | 5 | 1 793 o | 2 305 o | 1 280 o | ||
| NTRU | Non retenu par le NIST | 5 | 1 842 o | 2 366 o | 1 842 o | ||
| ML-DSA | Norme NIST | 3 | 1 952 o | 4 032 o | 3 309 o | ||
| HQC | Sélectionné par le NIST, norme en préparation | 1 | 2 249 o | 2 305 o | 4 433 o | ||
| SNOVA | Candidat du NIST | 1 | 2 320 o | 48 o | 165 o | ||
| NTRU | Non retenu par le NIST | 5 | 2 401 o | 2 983 o | 2 401 o | ||
| ML-DSA | Norme NIST | 5 | 2 592 o | 4 896 o | 4 627 o | ||
| SNOVA | Candidat du NIST | 3 | 2 716 o | 48 o | 454 o | ||
| MAYO | Candidat du NIST | 3 | 2 986 o | 32 o | 681 o | ||
| SNOVA | Candidat du NIST | 3 | 4 112 o | 48 o | 376 o | ||
| HQC | Sélectionné par le NIST, norme en préparation | 3 | 4 522 o | 4 586 o | 8 978 o | ||
| MAYO | Candidat du NIST | 1 | 4 912 o | 24 o | 186 o | ||
| MAYO | Candidat du NIST | 5 | 5 554 o | 40 o | 964 o | ||
| SNOVA | Candidat du NIST | 5 | 6 006 o | 48 o | 286 o | ||
| HQC | Sélectionné par le NIST, norme en préparation | 5 | 7 245 o | 7 317 o | 14 421 o | ||
| SNOVA | Candidat du NIST | 5 | 8 016 o | 48 o | 576 o | ||
| FrodoKEM | Non retenu par le NIST | 1 | 9 616 o | 19 888 o | 9 752 o | ||
| FrodoKEM | Non retenu par le NIST | 1 | 9 616 o | 19 888 o | 9 752 o | ||
| eFrodoKEM | Non retenu par le NIST | 1 | 9 616 o | 19 888 o | 9 720 o | ||
| eFrodoKEM | Non retenu par le NIST | 1 | 9 616 o | 19 888 o | 9 720 o | ||
| SNOVA | Candidat du NIST | 3 | 9 842 o | 48 o | 124 o | ||
| FrodoKEM | Non retenu par le NIST | 3 | 15 632 o | 31 296 o | 15 792 o | ||
| FrodoKEM | Non retenu par le NIST | 3 | 15 632 o | 31 296 o | 15 792 o | ||
| eFrodoKEM | Non retenu par le NIST | 3 | 15 632 o | 31 296 o | 15 744 o | ||
| eFrodoKEM | Non retenu par le NIST | 3 | 15 632 o | 31 296 o | 15 744 o | ||
| FrodoKEM | Non retenu par le NIST | 5 | 21 520 o | 43 088 o | 21 696 o | ||
| FrodoKEM | Non retenu par le NIST | 5 | 21 520 o | 43 088 o | 21 696 o | ||
| eFrodoKEM | Non retenu par le NIST | 5 | 21 520 o | 43 088 o | 21 632 o | ||
| eFrodoKEM | Non retenu par le NIST | 5 | 21 520 o | 43 088 o | 21 632 o | ||
| SNOVA | Candidat du NIST | 5 | 31 266 o | 48 o | 178 o | ||
| UOV | Candidat du NIST | 1 | 43 576 o | 237 896 o | 128 o | ||
| UOV | Candidat du NIST | 1 | 43 576 o | 32 o | 128 o | ||
| UOV | Candidat du NIST | 1 | 66 576 o | 348 704 o | 96 o | ||
| UOV | Candidat du NIST | 1 | 66 576 o | 32 o | 96 o | ||
| UOV | Candidat du NIST | 3 | 189 232 o | 1 044 320 o | 200 o | ||
| UOV | Candidat du NIST | 3 | 189 232 o | 32 o | 200 o | ||
| Classic McEliece | Non retenu par le NIST | 1 | 261 120 o | 6 492 o | 96 o | ||
| Classic McEliece | Non retenu par le NIST | 1 | 261 120 o | 6 492 o | 96 o | ||
| UOV | Candidat du NIST | 1 | 278 432 o | 237 896 o | 128 o | ||
| UOV | Candidat du NIST | 1 | 412 160 o | 348 704 o | 96 o | ||
| UOV | Candidat du NIST | 5 | 446 992 o | 2 436 704 o | 260 o | ||
| UOV | Candidat du NIST | 5 | 446 992 o | 32 o | 260 o | ||
| Classic McEliece | Non retenu par le NIST | 3 | 524 160 o | 13 608 o | 156 o | ||
| Classic McEliece | Non retenu par le NIST | 3 | 524 160 o | 13 608 o | 156 o | ||
| Classic McEliece | Non retenu par le NIST | 5 | 1 044 992 o | 13 932 o | 208 o | ||
| Classic McEliece | Non retenu par le NIST | 5 | 1 044 992 o | 13 932 o | 208 o | ||
| Classic McEliece | Non retenu par le NIST | 5 | 1 047 319 o | 13 948 o | 194 o | ||
| Classic McEliece | Non retenu par le NIST | 5 | 1 047 319 o | 13 948 o | 194 o | ||
| UOV | Candidat du NIST | 3 | 1 225 440 o | 1 044 320 o | 200 o | ||
| Classic McEliece | Non retenu par le NIST | 5 | 1 357 824 o | 14 120 o | 208 o | ||
| Classic McEliece | Non retenu par le NIST | 5 | 1 357 824 o | 14 120 o | 208 o | ||
| UOV | Candidat du NIST | 5 | 2 869 440 o | 2 436 704 o | 260 o |
What is in the zoo
The zoo lists every key encapsulation mechanism and signature scheme of
liboqs 0.15.1, the C library of the Open Quantum Safe project, as packaged for the web by
@oqs/liboqs-js: 103 parameter sets in 15 families. For each one you see the sizes that decide whether it fits
a protocol — public key, private key, signature or ciphertext — its NIST security level, the hard problem it
rests on, and how far it has come in standardization. Pick any of them and the lab measures it on your own device
against the classical algorithm it would replace.
Where each family stands
The status column follows NIST's post-quantum project as of 20 October 2026:
- Standards. ML-KEM (FIPS 203), ML-DSA (FIPS 204) and SLH-DSA (FIPS 205), final since August 2024. These are the algorithms to deploy, and the ones TLS, X.509, JOSE and HPKE now define.
- Selected, standard in preparation. Falcon, which NIST is turning into FN-DSA (FIPS 206, not final yet; liboqs still ships round-3 Falcon, which FN-DSA will not match byte for byte), and HQC, the code-based KEM NIST picked in March 2025 (NIST IR 8545) as a backup resting on a different problem than ML-KEM.
- Candidates. MAYO, UOV, SNOVA and CROSS are in NIST's process for additional signatures, which looks for schemes with short signatures or assumptions other than lattices. None is a standard; their parameters may still change.
- Not selected. Classic McEliece, FrodoKEM, NTRU and Streamlined NTRU Prime were evaluated and not
chosen by NIST. That is not a verdict of insecurity: Germany's BSI recommends FrodoKEM and Classic McEliece for
conservative deployments, both are part of an ISO/IEC 18033-2 amendment, and OpenSSH used
sntrup761x25519-sha512before it moved to ML-KEM. - Superseded. CRYSTALS-Kyber as submitted to round 3. FIPS 203 changed it, so Kyber and ML-KEM do not interoperate; liboqs keeps it for existing deployments.
Sizes first
For most systems the bytes matter more than the microseconds. A TLS handshake with X25519MLKEM768 carries 2,336 bytes for the key exchange instead of 64; an ML-DSA-65 signature is 3,309 bytes against 64 for Ed25519. The families spread over four orders of magnitude: UOV signatures start at 96 bytes, with public keys of up to 2.8 MB, Classic McEliece ciphertexts are under 210 bytes with public keys of up to 1.3 MB, and SLH-DSA keys are 32 to 64 bytes with signatures of up to 49,856. The table's last column puts public key plus signature or ciphertext on a logarithmic scale, the only one on which all of them fit. Sort by it to find the smallest exchange of each kind.
How the benchmark measures
Measuring downloads one liboqs module from this site — JavaScript with the WebAssembly embedded, about 18 to 55 KB
when compressed — and runs it in a Web Worker, so the page stays responsive even while Classic McEliece generates a
megabyte-sized key. For each operation the runner first calibrates a batch: how many operations it takes to
last at least 5 milliseconds, because browsers coarsen performance.now() to 0.1 ms on pages that are not
cross-origin isolated. It then times eleven batches and reports the median per operation, within a budget of
three seconds per operation, so the slowest sets report fewer samples and say so.
Every result is checked while it is measured: each signature must verify, a tampered signature must not, and each decapsulation must recover the encapsulated secret. A miscompiled module cannot report a fast but wrong number. The sizes the module produces are compared with the registry too.
The classical baselines run the same way, through WebCrypto (the browser's native implementation) or through
the @noble/curves JavaScript library: ECDSA P-256 and Ed25519 for signatures, X25519 for key
encapsulation, used as a KEM by sending a fresh ephemeral public key. Where the browser's WebCrypto lacks Ed25519
or X25519, the JavaScript version stands in and the page says so.
What stays local
The zoo takes no input of yours: keys are generated inside the worker for the measurement and discarded. The modules come from this site, and neither your device's details nor the results are sent anywhere. A share link records only the selected algorithm and the filters.
From the zoo to the standards
To use the standardized algorithms rather than time them, the post-quantum signature lab signs and verifies ML-DSA, SLH-DSA and Falcon with every FIPS option, and the ML-KEM lab runs the TLS hybrids. FN-DSA vs ML-DSA and ML-DSA vs SLH-DSA weigh the signature families against each other, and Post-quantum migration in 2026 explains which deadlines apply.